blogActive - Direct Action Tools from D.C.  Please Support blogActive.com - Click Here to Help

Friday, February 02, 2007

From the DNC...update

Just got back from the DNC meeting. Overall it was great. The mood in the LGBT caucus was really great and our community did very well in the rewriting of the delegate selection rules.

Every state party will be required to assess the participation of LGBT community members and then have policies to properly include delegates who are LGBT.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Morning sessions at the DNC

The morning DNC meeting had some great speeches. From my seat the best orator by far was Barak Obama. The most popular speaker was Hillary Clinton. And, I believe, Chris Dodd's speech had the best content. Dennis Kucinich had the best stand on the war... too bad he has no shot of winning the White House.

Quite a sea change here about bloggers who happen to out closeted anti-gay politicians. A few years ago folks didn't think so much about it. Now, knowing that Foley and all of the closeted senior staffers who protected him helped to win the election.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Live from the DNCwinter meeting

I am here at the Democratic National Committee meeting in Washington, DC. It's fun being "press.' (Note to my fellow bloggers at the meeting, don't settle for a blogger's pass. People who write blogs are press and the establishment needs to be taught that.)

I went to the Resolutions Committee meeting. Unbelievably, a resolution was introduced which supported fair and open elections. The resolution listed the many groups of disenfranchised communities...Well, except for one.... Care to guess? (I guess the authors of the resolution has not heard about the disenfranchisement of lesbians and gays in Alabama.)

Fortunately, one of the committee members moved to add "sexual orientation." Perhaps he caught wind of this.

I've heard Chris Dodd, John Edwards, and Wesley Clark all speak. Of course any one of these folks or any of those who have not yet spoken are better than the current bunch of homophobes at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Friday, January 26, 2007

Why We Fight

Every once in a while it is important for us to remember why we fight. To some of us, those of us who raise our voices every day in protest of the hatred we see in the world, the answer seems obvious. We fight for equality. But when one looks closer at that word, that reason, the rationale is not as easily defined as one would wish. Is it equality under the law? Equality in the eyes of our friends? Our families?

Every person has a reason why they fight this struggle for LGBT rights. Every person has a story that makes it that much more personal to them. I have a story. I have a dozen stories to tell you about why I fight every day for LGBT equality. I have another dozen stories for why I fight for racial equality, for class equality, for gender equality. I could tell a hundred thousand stories and they would all be different and they would all be the same.

But it all boils down to one simple thing. I, and all others who stand with me, fight for the recognition of every person’s dignity and inherent value.

Think about that for a second. Let it roll around in your head. Every person’s dignity and value. It’s not an easy concept – that every person has value.

That is why, to me, work on LGBT rights is inextricably intertwined with all other social justice movements. I am not just fighting for my dignity or your dignity but for the idea that each person has the same inherent dignity and value. That is equality.

When we win anti-discrimination laws, have a GSA in every school, an out politician in every statehouse, marriage equality in every state, the fight, for me, will have just begun. Legal recognition is the least of the battles. The greater battle has been fought, is being fought and will continue to be fought in the hearts of people throughout the world.

I fight for a world where all people are not just viewed under the law as equal, but where all people view all people as equal.

So long as a single sliver of inequality exists in the heart of just one person I will not stop fighting.

This is why I fight. Why do you?

By: Kyle DeVries | permanent link
|

Thursday, January 25, 2007

We have a situation (room): Cheney rails Blitzer

I'd like to know why Cheney thinks it's "out of line" to talk about his family but not out of line for the GOP to vilify mine...

Video: A Wolf earns Veep's loathing: Good As You

The ironic part is this... in 100 years no one is going to have any idea who the hell Dick Cheney was...his major legacy will be a self-loathing lesbian daughter who had a child.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

What was that about marriage, Michelle?

When she was in the State Senate, newly seated US Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-MN)) lead the effort to pass an amendment to Minnesota's state constitution banning marriage equality. Her anti-gay ways helped to prompt State Senator Paul Koering (R-Brainerd) to stand up against Bachmann in her own party, by coming out and voting with the community.

Apparently the Representative knows a thing or two about not letting go of a man. From KTSP TV:
Bush then leans over to kiss another congresswoman, but Bachmann is still holding on. Bachmann then gets more attention, a kiss and an embrace from the president. A few seconds later, Bachman's hand finally comes off the presidential shoulder.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Intolerable Tolerance

What is the most dangerous threat to the LGBT equality movement? Is it the screeching voices of violent homophobes like Fred Phelps of godhatesfags.com? The lagging complacence of mainstream America? The continual silence of LGBT individuals in places of power?

Some, such as Wayne Besen of Truth Wins Out, argue that it is the ex-gay movement that poses the greatest threat to LGBT equality. I simply cannot help but agree.

The ex-gay movement says sexual orientation and gender identity can be changed through religious conviction and therapy. They teach a doctrine of “love the sinner; hate the sin” that is rapidly being embraced by the evangelical Christian community, a community which over 50% of Americans identify with. These beliefs create an atmosphere that condemns LGBT individuals, perpetuating verbal and emotional violence, while falsely convincing people that they are LGBT-supportive.

The ex-gay movement can trace its origins far back in history, including to Nazi Germany, where some of the original experiments on “changing” sexuality were conducted. Today, therapy can include anything from religious consultation to electro-shock therapy (yeah, it still happens). For more information on the ex-gay movement visit Truth Wins Out.

But the real danger comes from the misinformation the ex-gay movement uses to indoctrinate well-meaning religious individuals. The belief that sexual orientation can be changed is hardly novel, however the perpetuation of this myth to a new and increasingly LGBT-friendly generation does worlds of harm to both LGBT and allied youth. People begin to believe that they can be ‘tolerant’ of LGBT people while still trying to change them. However, it is theis often loudly spoken belief that LGBT individuals can and should change that does the most harm.

Take, for example, the case that PageOneQ recently exposed in Montgomery County Maryland. Due to a fluke in the schools flyering policy, an ex-gay group, P-FOX(Parents and Friends of Ex-gays) will be the only organization providing materials to the district’s schools on February 1st. Thousands of students will be exposed to the anti-gay views of this organization while being provided no opposite viewpoint that affirms LGBT individuals.

How many of those students will begin to believe that they can ‘tolerate’ their friends’ sexuality while continually trying to change them? How many LGBT students will be told they should change or else go to hell by friends who think they are doing the right thing? LGBT individuals already face huge amounts of societal pressure to not accept their own identity. Every day four more youth kill themselves because of their queer identity and the verbal violence that surrounds them. Adding in friends who think they are helping but are in fact only adding to that verbal violence does not help the situation that most LGBT individuals face. The mental and emotional harm is done is apparent. And because of the ex-gay movement these students will continue to think that they are being tolerant of LGBT individuals and have no need to change themselves. After all, to christians who have bought into the ex-gay messaging, it’s the LGBT kids who need to change and become better people, not them.

By: Kyle DeVries | permanent link
|
Woo Hoo.... It's Contest time!
Here's the scoop.

Brokeback is coming out on super super fantastic double DVD edition. And Universal Home Video has given the site 5 copies to give away. So... drop me an email at brokebackdvdcontest@gmail.com and I will notify 5 winners next week.

Here are some fun clips from the movie and you can read a list of the DVD's features here.

By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Monday, January 22, 2007

A new server.... Again?

Yup. Some servers just aren't designed for the latest technology...and over the next three months, I'm going to need just that. COMING SOON.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Major tech issues

PageoneQ and blogACTIVE are undergoing yet another server switch. PageOneQ resides and is published via a content system which resides on PageOneQ servers and while blogACTIVE is published with Blogger's interface...it publishes to PageOneQ's server too... I expect both sites to be up and fully running by noon Monday.

Mike
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Sunday, January 14, 2007

Four out of four! DNC adds policy to website



Good news. I had a feeling that once the political arms of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) added their non-discrimination policies to their respective websites that the DNC itself would feel the pressure to add it as well. Bingo!

I am happy to report that my campaign to have all of the national party arms add their non-discrimination policy to their websites has been a 100% success.

Here's a recap and an easy way for you to gain the attention of folks in positions to make things happen. Armed with a $9.20 domain name -- www.WhereIsThePolicy.com -- (the most important activist tool of the 21st century) an activist can demand and make change.

Here's the recap:

The matter of these policies came to my attention when a political activist in Florida told me this past April that the non-discrimination policy of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) did not include "sexual orientation" as a protected class. Over at PageOneQ I did some investigating and reporting.

In response to my report, the Committee yanked the policy and, within a couple of days, reposted it with "sexual orientation" listed. There are lingering questions as to whether or not the policy was quickly changed or whether it was simple an error of omission on the website. You can read these and judge for yourself:

In response to inquiry, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee yanks job policy from website and UPDATE: Dem. Organization Changes Website.

At the same time, I learned that the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) did not have their policy posted at all. At first the staff there were not very responsive. Once I asked them to confirm their individual emails so I could post them on this site to ask readers to write them on the omission they got it together and posted the policy.

I summarized the story here:
Finally, the Democrats are getting it....

In the same article I reported that the Democratic National Committee and Democratic Governor's Association (DGA) did not list their policies on their sites. When I told some friends that I was going to pursue this, they asked me to wait until after the election. I postponed my campaign for nine months, until this week when I decided to pick this up and run with it.

I visited all four sites. The DCCC was missing the policy they had on their site previously. In all fairness, they did a redesign and as soon as I spoke to their press office, they linked it.

The DGA was next. At first I encountered a little bit of resistance. I explained that The DSCC and the DCCC had added it and that now that the election was over I was poised to launch WhereIsThePolicy.com to encourage the national Democratic organizations to post the policy. Within a few days the DGA had the policy posted too.

Now that the political arms had done the right thing, it was time to move on to the national Committee. They were a little tougher. The DNC spokesperson defended, time and time again, the Party's decision to not post the policy on line.

Not only did the party appear to be hiding its non-discrimination clause from the public, but also an individual calling the DNC about applying for a job was refused a copy of the policy. "Unbelievable," I thought.

"We do not post any personnel policies on our website," I was told back in April and again this week.

"This is not a personnel policy, it's a public statement," I explained to each person at the DNC I spoke with. Non-discrimination statements not only serve to educate perspective employees, but also are an important signal to other political organizations and companies.

Unsatisfied with the response I was getting, I decided to escalate the contacts and spoke with the Director of Communications of the DNC. I explained my campaign and why I thought the policy should be posted on line. I also asked who at the DNC was directly responsible for the decision to omit the policy from the site.



It wasn't more than a day or so when I received an email from the DNC's communications office. They added the policy!

Four out of four! It's nice to know that with a little bit of activist pressure, even one guy at one computer, can change these huge organizations.

So: The DNC, DSCC, DGA, and DCCC... Not bad for a couple of hours work.
Cost of www.WhereIsThePolicy.com: $9.20
Cost of web access, one week: $16.00
Demanding and receiving action from multi million dollar political machines: Priceless
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Buses, Bibles and Youth, Oh My!

I am writing this coming off of one of the most amazing experiences of my life. For those of you who didn't catch Mike mentioning it, I was at a five day training to be a participant in Soulforce's 2007 Equality Ride. I spent the five days with sixty of the most talented and passionate young activist in the country. Through lack of sleep and abundance of energy the sixty of us managed to push through intense community building, spiritual learning and, of course, bible boot camp.


Equality Ride 2006

The Equality Ride is based on the premise of non-violent activism used by Ghandi and Martin Luther King Jr. (and many more). That means that every action is directed towards reconciliation with your adversaries, not victory over them. It's about challenging assumptions without causing pain; going forth with love in your heart; taking whatever they have to throw at you and moving forward despite it.

The part about the Equality Ride that draws me like a moth to the rainbow-colored flame is the purposeful approach to direct action. The Equality Ride is not about getting in people's faces, but we certainly aren't afraid to. It's a rare thing for the LGBT community, whose lack of visibility has pretty much defined the movement so far. The direct action and complete honesty that the Equality Ride and SoulForce offer is a breath of fresh air that reminds us of similar, necessary actions that have taken place during every other civil rights movement. I hope it's a sign of the times - maybe we are finally ready to stand up and shout "no more!”

On a side note I leave on a flight in one and a half hours for D.C. where I will be attending People for the American Way's Young People For conference. Yes, that means I had a total of two days here in sunny Florida and did not sleep at all tonight. Wish me luck!
By: Kyle DeVries | permanent link
|

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

$9.20 can buy a lot of attention and action

Late yesterday afternoon I received word that a second organization reconsidered my policy posting request and decided to post their non-discrimination policy. Amazing what $9.20 can do. Kudos to the Democratic Governors Association.

I received a couple of emails asking me if I felt that it was fair to characterize my exchange with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee as a "victory." Well, considering how adamantly these organizations were opposed to my request to post their non-discrimination policies on-line, I do consider it a success for the little guy when he can spend $9.20 to bring four multi-million dollar groups to the table... And when he gets two of those organizations to move in less than 24 hours that is a victory.

It really is kind of funny.

One guy asks the Democratic National Committee, The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic Governors Association to add their non-discrimination policy to their website. They say "no," he slaps back, they say "yes." (Activists have fought long and hard for those policies to be created. It makes no sense to keep them hidden in a personnel director's file cabinet.)

Early on in my effort to have these policies posted, the DSCC fell into line. It took them a few emails. Sources inside the DSCC tell me they quickly added "sexual orientation" right after I made my inquiry. That doesn't really matter, though. They heard the concern, they posted the policy.

The others weren't so easy to convince.

Then, yesterday at 10:50am, I bought a domain: www.WhereIsThePolicy.com.



BOOM! The very morning that I bought the domain and explained to the DCCC that I was going to launch the site, they got the message.

And late yesterday afternoon, word comes from my request of the Democratic Governors Association that they had added the policy to their site, too.



Remember, when I made this request EVERY one of these organizations initially refused to put their policy on-line.

OK, so I took a couple of slaps. Granted, it's certainly not a victory along the lines of passage of a comprehensive hate crimes bill or ENDA... Still, progress is made in small steps and the story here is not that the DCCC or the DGA added their policy to their site, but that one person, sitting at a computer can get the attention of these multi-million dollar a year political organizations and smack them into line to do what they know is right.

Although the DNC is resistant, I have a feeling once they see that all of their constituent groups are lining up on these, they too will see the benefit of posting the policy.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Monday, January 08, 2007

VICTORY: DCCC to add Non-discrimination policy to website today!

I had an email exchange with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee today. I'm really happy to report that less than two hours after I sent a reminder email this morning I received a reply.

I wrote a note explaining that I had hoped it was not necessary to launch my new domain purchase, www.WhereIsThePolicy.com.
Mike,

I understand you had some questions about the posting of the non-discrimination policy on the DCCC website.

The non-discrimination policy is listed on our individual job descriptions -- we're happy to post it on the jobs page also -- since it is on the descriptions themselves we didn't think to post on main page -- but we will make sure that is changed. I have been assured that this will be done by cob at the latest. If there is anything else I can assist with—please don’t hesitate to ask.

Best
[name redacted]
YES! ONE person can move mountains. Now, onto the DNC!
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Captions please....


Please, please, please tell me you didn't
let Foley get his hands on this.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

Happy New Year

Happy New Year... I spent some time over the holidays to catch up and write a bit about the past few months. It was nice to have a short break.

Some exciting things are around the corner... Kyle heads out soon for Equality Ride training and I'm working closely with my friend Liza to create a new site which I think will make a big contribution to the community and the 2008 elections.

* * *

As soon as the new year arrived, so did big lgbt news. In an op-ed in today's New York Times a former Chairman of the Joint Chief's of Staff, General John M. Shalikashvili (Ret.), callsfor teh repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell.



I wrote an article about it on my news site, PageOneQ.com.

The fun thing about Google ads is that they run based on the text on the page... here's a couple of fun combos courtesy of Google and my article on gays in the military.



By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Thursday, December 28, 2006

Thank you Steve and Stephanie...

What could connect a five year old boat trip and the latest issue of The Advocate? If you'd like to know, Read on.

Five years ago, as I embarked the Rainbow Warrior, the flagship of Greenpeace, I knew the trip I was about to begin would be one of my life's most memorable experiences. As a staff member of the then 30-year old environmental organization, I was encouraged to take a trip on the boat, and what better event to sail to than Greenpeace's 30th anniversary party on the piers of Manhattan's west side?



I knew the trip ahead was going to be one filled with many memorable moments. Little did I know, however, that being aboard that ship would connect me to an incredible group of people in a way no one ever imagined; people who, for the rest of my life, I will be inextricably linked.

So, there I was, aboard this incredible ship, rich with history, with these amazing people. Off the coast of Massachusetts we saw the majesty of whales breaching and, as we sailed down the east coast, a group of dolphins swam alongside the front of the ship swimming ahead as if to guide us on our journey.

Over the years, the Warrior has hosted visits by the Dalai Lama and the band U2. The ship has been used to evacuate an island contaminated by radiation, participated in actions to prevent the killing of whales, and years after my trip, provided relief after the 2004 South East Asia Tsunami. I had no idea that the ship was about to, once again, be present at one of those moments that will be remembered for generations. (The current Rainbow Warrior was launched on July 10, 1989, on the fourth anniversary of the bombing of the original by the French government.)



On this day, September 11, 2001, we were just off the coast of Long Island headed to New York City. As we sailed along the shore toward Manhattan, a rising plume of smoke could be seen in the distance. It was, no doubt, skyward-headed proof of the horror we had witnessed earlier in the boat's small, crowded radio room on an old TV with fuzzy reception.

After spending the day anchored off the coast of Manhattan, we were directed by the Coast Guard to continue down the east coast and then up the Delaware River to Philadelphia.

This was not the time to question such directives.

The remainder of our trip was surreal. The feelings of safety I felt aboard this ship at sea, away from the horror of the day, were only bested by my strong desire to want to be on land, at home, on familiar ground.

As ordered, we made our way up the Delaware and docked in Philadelphia, where we we hopped in a van for the trip back to DC. It felt very strange to step back into a world that had been so rocked. As each of us was dropped off at our respective homes, we knew this experience would bind us together for a lifetime.

For that experience, Greenpeace will always hold a special place in my heart.

* * *

It is those types of connections at Greenpeace that contributed to my excitement, five years later when I saw lesbian and gay environmentalists as the subject of a feature story in the latest issue of The Advocate. In a great story, spanning seven pages, Rachel Powell profiles no less than five Greenpeacers.



I cannot begin to describe the sense of pride I feel in my out lesbian and gay colleagues at Greenpeace, especially Steve Smith and Stephanie Hillman of the US office. I had the honor of working alongside Steve and Stephanie…There are no people more committed to saving the planet than these two. To know we are inextricably linked because our mutual connections to the world's best know environmental organization, makes me all the more prideful.

Being out in the gay and lesbian activist world is one thing. Being out and proud in a field which thrives on the machismo of sailors and forest saving is entirely something else. Thank you Steve, Stephanie and all of those profiled for your work for being out and for your undying commitment to the planet.

Click on these links to see profiles of Steve Smith and Stephanie Hillman from The Advocate.

Special thanks to Anne Dougherty for providing the photograph from aboard the Rainbow Warrior. Since its inception Greenpeace has held firm to the principle of bearing witness. It is the talents of Greenpeace's gifted photographers that document the worst travesties against our planet, for all to see. Thank you, Anne.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Saying goodbye to Congressman Kolbe

U.S. Rep. Jim Kolbe (R) will be retiring next month and has taken the opportunity to talk with Washington Blade about his experience being the only openly gay Republican in Congress.

From Southeastern Arizona, Kolbe came out in 1996 after voting for the Defense of Marriage Act, afraid that he would be outed by the media or certain organizations *ahem*. Since then, he's been an avid supporter of LGBT rights, earning him a perfect "100" from the Human Rights Campaign's Congressional Scorecard this past year. But you can read all about that in the article. The real question is: how did this man become a visible supporter of LGBT equality? Could it be that his expediated coming out helped Kolbe support LGBT rights?

The inevitable answer is yes. Coming out of the closet gave Kolbe the confidence to become a vocal advocate for LGBT rights. Kolbe even says:
“My strongest contributions were simply standing up and talking about these issues on the floor, in caucuses and when it came up for debate. There’s something to be said for speaking up for equality.”
Kolbe had nothing to lose from speaking honestly; he was already known to be gay. He also said about coming out:
“It was the most gratifying thing that’s ever happened to me. It was a huge burden that was lifted from me.”
Still, Kolbe denounces groups like blogACTIVE and Proud of Who We Are for their outing of politicians, despite the obvious beneficial impact it had on him personally.

To that I say: COME ON JIM! You already admitted you would not have come out without the pressure that we at blogACTIVE and others like us provide. You've said that it was a huge personal relief to come out. It obviously didn't hurt your political career. Instead of condemning us you should be thanking us. We both know there are a lot more closeted Republicans in political power who continue to fight against LGBT rights. Congressman Kolbe, you should be joining us in calling for these hypocrites and liars to come out of the closet so that they can experience the joys of honesty that you have.

And on a different level, I want to personally thank Congressman Kolbe for his strength and tenacity. It takes enormous courage to become the first openly gay Republican in Congress. We must never forget the incredible service that Congressman Kolbe has done for the LGBT community. I only hope that others may see him as a role model and follow in his footsteps.
By: Kyle DeVries | permanent link
|

Larry Craig, Not a straight shooter...

Well, I'll give the NRA one thing...While they are not out racebaiting and fighting progress, I'm glad to see they are open minded enough to give an award to a gay Senator... Congratulations, Larry!

Is that a gun in your pocket, Larry,
or are you just excited to see me?

The Raw Story | NRA comic called a hoax, but accusations later withdrawn: A controversial, leaked graphic novel produced to bolster the National Rifle Association's agenda was called a hoax over the weekend. But further analysis of the source material appears to confirm that the purported NRA publication, which contains alarming racial overtones, is legitimate.

Raw Story has the comic book.

A source of mine at the NRA tells me the Larry Craig situation is no secret there.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Thursday, December 21, 2006

A Holiday Gift to Ken

First off, let me apologize to everybody for not posting for so long. I have learned two things recently. They are:

1) Don't disappear from college for two weeks and expect no repercussions.
2) Two week activist journeys are certainly worth said repercussions.

That being said I am back on the blogosphere and ready to reveal the fun Mike and I had while I was in Washington D.C.

You all (hopefully) remember when Bill Maher was censored on CNN for outing Ken Mehlman. Well, Mike and I decided that we would find out what Ken thought about that. After all, the Republicans are always going on about how accepting they are and how being gay isn't a bad thing - we decided to go to Republican National Committee and give them a chance to put those words into action. View the hilarious results (along with some interviews on the street) below. It's our holiday gift to Ken.


By: Kyle DeVries | permanent link
|

I've waited... It's an issue...

Some time ago I noticed that the Democratic National Committee refused to put its non-discrimination clause on its website. After a few emails with staffers at the DNC, a number of fellow political activists suggested I wait until after the mid-term election to make this an issue.

I've waited... It's an issue.

I had another recent exchange with the press office of the DNC... And while the human resources department refused to provide the policy back when I first asked for it, the media folks sent it to me:
The DNC is committed to a policy of equal employment opportunity. It is our policy to recruit, hire, train, promote and administer any and all personnel actions without regard to sex, race, age, color, creed, national origin, religion, economic status, sexual orientation, ethnic identity or physical disability, or any other legally protected basis. The DNC will not tolerate any unlawful discrimination and any such conduct is prohibited.

All job openings are to be posted internally and priority consideration should be given to current staff and minorities. Within certain limitations, all new employees should be vetted before hire.
Now, I'm not saying the DNC has to put this on the top of the front page, but why won't they put it somewhere, anywhere, on the site? A great place might be on the bottom of the "About Our Party" page, below the bit about internships at the DNC.

Damien Lavera, a spokesman for the DNC, explains it this way:
As I've mentioned before, we do not put any human resources or personnel-related documents on our website. Our site is devoted solely to providing Democrats and common-sense voters with the tools they need to interact with candidates and state parties, help disseminate our party's message, and help Democrats win up and down the ballot in every state.
Sorry, Damien, not good enough.

Is the DNC ashamed equal employment policies? What good are non-discrimination policies if they are kept a secret from the public? And, don't such policies demonstrate the party's commitment to equality? Back when I first learned this news, a job seeker who called the DNC was also refused a copy of the policy.

A non-discrimination clause is not just a "policy" for employees, it's a statement to the general public about an organization's beliefs. Does the DNC believe in non-discrimination or don't they.

This issue, I promise you, will not end until the DNC starts to stand up for what it believes in. Their refusal to post this policy is pathetic.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

New Life Church....

Is it me, or does every last one of them look gay?
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Another poll...

This site's readers have been big supporters of Lane Hudson, the blogger who first posted the Mark Foley letters. I'll be writing more about his being honored by Time magazine and The Advocate in a bit. In the meantime, I hope you'll visit Joe My God and vote in the Queer of the Year contest.

As regulars here know, I believe it was his taking the risk he did that help make sure the homophobes got tossed from congress.

I hope you'll vote for him here.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Sunday, December 17, 2006

James Dobson's next target...?

I bet he goes berserk over this new candy... They even got the order of the rainbow right!

By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

A gay hero needs our help

Within hours of Ted Haggard's exposure, the community was calling on folks to donate funds to Mike Jones, the man who exposed the evangelist of hate as a closeted, a crystal meth user.

I was a bit confused. If we are to believe Jones, he was not a regular dealer of crystal. So, It's not like his telling the truth about Haggard cost him much. And, as I predicted the same day the story broke, Jones inked a book deal soon after going public. Not bad for a man who helped fuel our community's meth problems.

While I love exposing hypocrites and am thrilled Jones did what he did, his actions had nothing to do with the Democrats taking Congress. To find the start of the Republican decline one need look no further than the date that Lane Hudson posted the first set of Mark Foley emails on his blog, Sunday, September 24.

Unlike Jones, Hudson has no income, no book deal, and no job. I believe Lane deserves -- and I know he needs -- our help; I hope you agree. I hope you'll consider clicking here to send Lane a few bucks so he can maintain his apartment through the holidays. When you sit down and think of how grateful you are that the homophobes have been tossed out, toss a little gratefulness toward Lane -- he's responsible for a lot of holiday cheer out there.

If you need proof, take a look at the gambling and odds tracking sites. There are no better predictors of political winds and up until the day that Lane posted the emails the GOP had been enjoying a slow, yet steady, rise in the polls.

Before he was exposed as the blogger who posted the emails, Hudson did not seek the spotlight and went to great lengths to maintain his anonymity. His one misstep, sending a personal email while connected to his employer's network, cost him his job and Lane is still unemployed. (Lane has far too much class than to condemn the organization he worked for...the problem here is that no one else on the left is stepping up to help him.)


Lane Hudson tells
his story in the Advocate

Given the choice between the publicity seeking meth salesman and an 'on the ground' field organizer who hoped to remain anonymous and lost his job by blogging, the answer is easy. In every case, I'll stick with the guy who has dedicated his life to long-standing social change.

I've been lucky. After two and a half years of this work, I have finally become able to regularly cover expenses and continue my work. Trust me, it's not easy. I completely identify with where Lane is right now and I hope folks will consider stepping up to the plate to give him a hand...every penny counts, especially for this great hero to our community and everyone else who stands for a progressive agenda.

I'm not asking readers to do anything I haven't done myself. I hope you will consider joining me in making a gift to Lane. And, as I write this, I've convinced myself to go back to Lane's site and send him an extra bit.

While Lane seeks work, he's using his years of experience on Capital Hill to continue to write about stories and, to me, it's all the more reason to give him a helping hand.

If you wake up and wonder "What could I do to really, really help someone who contributed to this past election?" The answer is a no-brainer, make a gift to Lane Hudson.

If you're a blogger, I hope you'll consider running this ad, with this link, on your site for a few days or that you will post about this effort.



Thanks!
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Monday, December 11, 2006

Are there any heterosexuals in Colorado?

No wonder Marilyn Musgrave is all over the gays... we're all over her state:
Pastor resigns over homosexuality:
In a tearful videotaped message Sunday to his congregation, the senior pastor of a thriving evangelical megachurch in south metro Denver confessed to sexual relations with other men and announced he had voluntarily resigned his pulpit.

A month ago, the Rev. Paul Barnes of Grace Chapel in Doug las County preached to his 2,100-member congregation about integrity and grace in the aftermath of the Ted Haggard drugs-and-gay-sex scandal.

Now, the 54-year-old Barnes joins Haggard as a fallen evangelical minister who preached that homosexuality was a sin but grappled with a hidden life.
Here's a Denver Post item about a recent sermon of Barnes:

On Nov. 5, the Rev. Paul Barnes scrapped his prepared sermon. The Rev. Ted Haggard scandal was still unfolding, and he couldn't let it go unnoticed.

So Barnes wrote a new sermon: "Integrity, Sin and Grace."

Barnes defined integrity as "being the same on the outside as you are on the inside."

All people come to God broken, he said. Maybe it's alcoholism, he said. Or a bad temper. Or pornography. Some people overcome their problems; others continue to live with them, he said.

"Most of us, if the truth were known, we wear masks," Barnes said. "... Sometimes, we wear masks because we want to be appear more perfect than we are. But the reality of it is, all of us are so very imperfect."

By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Friday, December 08, 2006

Republicans negligent in Foley matter

From Raw Story:
A House ethics panel announced today Republican members of congress showed 'disconcerting unwillingness' and negligence in handling inappropriate e-mails sent from former Congressman Mark Foley (R-FL) to underage pages, RAW STORY has learned.

A report set to be issued by the panel indicates that Republican leadership failed to protect the teens from Foley's behavior.

However, the panel also concluded that no specific House rules were broken in handling the matter, and no disciplinary action should be taken against the parties found to be negligent.

Foley resigned in his sixth term in late September after emails and sexually explicit instant messages to House interns surfaced.

Next up: Foxes say they watch chicken house just fine...move along...
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Liza has a store...

Check it out. Liza over at Culture Kitchen has posted about her new Mary Cheney Baby Shower store. Liza asked for readers to share their own designs... Here's mine...



Hop on over to Liza's blog...Keep an eye out for other fun designs she's asked readers to submit.
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

A milestone...

Not as exciting as 1,000. But considering it all, it's nice to recognize a milestone...

By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

From Jeremy at Good As You:
This is a totally unconfirmed Internet rumor. We repeat, this is a totally unconfirmed Internet rumor sent to us by a reader: Robert Traynham, the spokesman for recently defeated, extremely anti-gay Senator Rick Santorum, is rumored to be the choice of....
Hop over to Jeremy's site and see what the buzz is about.

(At least when this guy appeared at the LOGO party in DC he told people he was closeted and then outed by me.)
By: Michael Rogers | permanent link
|